JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 27, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Mariana Bacca Benavides Vs. Esap

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Penal Del Circuito De Bogota, D.C. Y El Juzgado Segundo Administrativo Del Circuito De Yopal, Casanare. Ordena Al Juzgado Segundo Administrativo Del Circuito De Yopal Que Inicie El Tramite De La Tutela Y Profiera La Decision Que Corresponda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Inmediacion De La Prueba Y Oportunidad
  • Improcedencia de aplicación en tutela por ser dicha acción un trámite constitucional y no un proceso
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Reglas jurisprudenciales fundamentales
  • Competencia a prevención
  • Competencia de juez del circuito
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Administrativo del Circuito de Yopal que, de forma inmediata, inicie el tramite de la accion de tutela de la referencia y profiera la decision de instancia que corresponda, conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.